Bibliographic record
Abstract
If, after filing a Notice of Objection with the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) and after the CRA's review of your objection, you still dispute the tax bill, you can appeal to the Tax Court of Canada within 90 days from the date of the CRA's review. An informal procedure (s. 18 and informal procedure rules) can be followed, which is intended to simplify the appeal process. To access the informal procedure, the amount of federal tax and penalties for each taxation year, excluding interest, is limited to $12,000. If more tax is in dispute, the excess over $12,000 cannot be subject to the informal appeal. You can use the general procedure even if you qualify for the informal procedure. The Court will forward your appeal to Justice Canada, which represents the CRA. A reply containing the CRA's position comes back within 60 days and you may answer the reply within 30 days. Parties exchange lists of the documents. Examinations for discovery help clarify the issues. Other procedures are available and eventually an oral hearing may be scheduled. The Court wants to keep appeals moving along so time limits may be set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".