MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794012818 · doi:10.22452/sejarah.vol26no1.3

ILMU KOLONIAL DAN ISLAMISASI ALAM MELAYU: ANALISIS KRITIKAL

2017· article· id· W2794012818 on OpenAlexaff
Rahimin Affandi Abd. Rahim, Siti Maimunah Kahal

Bibliographic record

VenueSEJARAH · 2017
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Studies and History
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalayIslamColonialismIslamizationMalay peninsulaDenialHistoryPower (physics)Religious studiesEthnologySociologyPolitical scienceAncient historyPhilosophyPsychologyLinguisticsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malaysia as a colonized nation had faced several negative impact imposed by the British. It including in the epistemological aspect which disturb Islam as source of Malay-Muslim‟s self-esteem. The study analyse the British‟s colonial work on the issues of Islamizatioin of the peninsula of Malaya.The Malay Muslims were forced passively to accept the colonialization of the British power with positive outlook. In fact, we try to reconstruct a historical misconceptions expressed by colonial scholars. The study finds several false account proposed by colonial works on the Islamization of the Malay world, namely the role of Aceh in inoculating the acts of violence in Malay world and denial of positive role played by Islam in the Malay world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSEJARAHSame topicAsian Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207