«Tentato storicismo»: Enzo Siciliano lettore indocile di Bassani
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’articolo affronta nella sua prima parte il rapporto editoriale e culturale fra Giorgio Bassani e Enzo Siciliano, con particolare riguardo alla comune polemica contro la neoavanguardia. Nella seconda e più vasta parte, si analizza la lettura critica che Siciliano fece dell’opera narrativa dell’autore ferarrese in un ampio e importante saggio del 1966 (con un’appendice del 1968), in cui Siciliano, sulla scia di alcune osservazioni di Pier Paolo Pasolini, intendeva demistificare ideologicamente l’approccio storicistico di Bassani, mostrando i tratti conservativi borghesi della sua retrospezione memoriale. Il punto d’incontro, su un piano di poetica, fra Siciliano e Bassani risiede comunque nella concezione del personaggio di romanzo, enigma per lo stesso autore, al quale si impone con una forza e con un’evidenza la cui natura rimane ineffabile e irriducibile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".