Active earth pressure for soils with tension cracks under steady unsaturated flow conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The calculation of active earth pressure has commonly been performed under dry or saturated conditions. However, in practice soils are usually unsaturated. With the aim of estimating active earth pressure under steady unsaturated flow conditions, this paper describes a new method within the framework of the kinematic approach of limit analysis. A closed-form formula is adopted to estimate the suction stress of unsaturated soils subjected to vertical steady flow. A rotational failure mechanism composed of a log-spiral curve and a vertical crack is presented for calculations of the external work rate and internal energy dissipation rate. Pre-existing cracks as well as cracks that form as part of the failure mechanism are considered in the present work. The maximum depth of cracks is determined by requiring the vertical crack boundary to be stable. Explicit expressions about the thrust of active earth pressure for different crack types are derived from the work–energy balance equation, and the most critical solutions are obtained by optimizing the variables from the failure mechanism. Numerical results for different parameters are calculated and given in the form of graphs for practical use. A parametric study is performed to investigate the impact of different parameters on the active earth pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".