MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794052717 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v36i00a06

Statement on Seasonal Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (TIV) for 2010-2011

2010· article· en· W2794052717 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsStatement (logic)Trivalent influenza vaccineInfluenza vaccineSeasonal influenzaVirologyMedicineEnvironmental healthCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)VaccinationInternal medicinePhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PreambleThe National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) provides the Public Health Agency of Canada with ongoing and timely medical, scientific and public health advice relating to immunization and certain prophylaxis agents.The Public Health Agency of Canada acknowledges that the advice and recommendations set out in this statement are based upon the best current available scientific knowledge and is disseminating this document for information purposes.People administering the vaccine should also be aware of the contents of the relevant product leaflet(s).Recommendations for use and other information set out herein may differ from that set out in the product monograph(s)/leaflet(s) of the Canadian manufacturer(s).Manufacturer(s) have sought approval of the vaccine(s) and provided evidence as to safety and efficacy only when it is used in accordance with the Préambule Le Comité consultatif national de l'immunisation (CCNI) donne à l'Agence de la santé publique du Canada des conseils constants et à jour liés à l'immunisation et à certains agents prophylactiques dans le domaine de la médecine, des sciences et de la santé publique.L'Agence de la santé publique du Canada reconnaît que les conseils et les recommandations figurant dans la présente déclaration reposent sur les connaissances scientifiques les plus récentes et diffuse ce document à des fins d'information.Les personnes qui administrent le vaccin doivent également connaître le contenu du ou des dépliants pertinents sur le produit.Les recommandations d'utilisation et les autres renseignements qui figurent dans le présent document peuvent différer du contenu des monographies de produit ou des dépliants établis par les fabricants du vaccin au Canada.Les fabricants ont fait approuver les vaccins et ont démontré leur innocuité et leur efficacité uniquement lorsqu'ils sont utilisés conformément à la monographie An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) † StAtemeNt oN SeASoNAl trIvAleNt INACtIvAted INflueNzA vACCINe (tIv) for 2010-2011 Déclaration d'un comité consultatif (DCC) Comité consultatif national de l'immunisation (CCNI) † déClArAtIoN Sur le vACCIN trIvAleNt INACtIvé (vtI) CoNtre lA grIPPe Pour lA SAISoN 2010-2011

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0150.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207