MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794081792 · doi:10.4000/communication.7511

Jefferson D. POOLEY (2016), James W. Carey and Communication Research: Reputation at the University’s Margins

2018· article· en· W2794081792 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Dominique Trudel

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicVisual Culture and Art Theory
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReputationMedia studiesLibrary scienceManagementSociologyPsychologyEconomicsSocial scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les recherches de Jefferson Pooley portent principalement sur l’histoire des études en communication et participent au regain d’intérêt, depuis une dizaine d’années, envers l’histoire du champ d’études. Pooley a notamment coédité un ouvrage destiné à devenir un classique, The history of media and communication research: Contested memories (Pooley et Park, 2008), et assemblé une imposante bibliographie thématique sur l’histoire intellectuelle de la communication. Son dernier ouvrage, James W. ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicVisual Culture and Art TheoryFrench-language works237,207