MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794114922 · doi:10.1017/s155192950005330x

Cleaning a Cold Cathode Gauge Tube

2003· article· en· W2794114922 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Owen P. Mills

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy Today · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsCold cathodeGauge (firearms)Tube (container)CathodeVendorElectrical engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringMetallurgyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This topic appeared on the MSA list server In December 2002 and January 2003. While cleaning my gauge tube recently, I documented the steps. In this article I describe cleaning a Varian 524-2 gauge tube. There are a number of other cold cathode and penning style gauge tubes on the market, Edwards CP-25 (old penning), CVC GPH-001A(old cold cathode), Pfeiffer IRK 250 (new cold cathode) to name a few. The cleaning steps are very similar. Consult the instructions that came with the gauge tube or visit the vendor's websites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1040.084

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy TodaySame topicExperimental and Theoretical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207