Phosphorylation-mediated structural changes within the SOAR domain of stromal interaction molecule 1 enable specific activation of distinct Orai channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low-conductance, highly calcium-selective channels formed by the Orai proteins exist as store-operated CRAC channels and store-independent, arachidonic acid-activated ARC channels. Both are activated by stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1), but CRAC channels are activated by STIM1 located in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, whereas ARC channels are activated by the minor plasma membrane-associated pool of STIM1. Critically, maximally activated CRAC channel and ARC channel currents are completely additive within the same cell, and their selective activation results in their ability to each induce distinct cellular responses. We have previously shown that specific ARC channel activation requires a PKA-mediated phosphorylation of a single threonine residue (Thr 389 ) within the cytoplasmic region of STIM1. Here, examination of the molecular basis of this phosphorylation-dependent activation revealed that phosphorylation of the Thr 389 residue induces a significant structural change in the STIM1-Orai-activating region (SOAR) that interacts with the Orai proteins, and it is this change that determines the selective activation of the store-independent ARC channels versus the store-operated CRAC channels. In conclusion, our findings reveal the structural changes underlying the selective activation of STIM1-induced CRAC or ARC channels that determine the specific stimulation of these two functionally distinct Ca 2 entry pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".