MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2794152261 · doi:10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.5

Hypoxia related mRNA biomarker to predict biochemical failure and metastasis for prostate cancer.

2018· article· en· W2794152261 on OpenAlexaff
Ananya Choudhury, Lingjian Yang, Darren L. Roberts, Mandeep Takhar, Vinayak Bhandari, B. Bibby, Wei‐Chen Cheng, Syed Haider, Niluja Thiruthaneeswaran, Peter Hoskin, Darragh G. McArt, Suneil Jain, Francesca M. Buffa, Nicholas Erho, Robert G. Bristow, Paul C. Boutros, Elai Davicioni, Catharine West

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of TorontoOccupational Cancer Research CentreGenome British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerMedicineProstatectomyRadiation therapyBiochemical recurrenceOncologyHypoxia (environmental)DU145Internal medicineMetastasisLNCaPCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5 Background: Hypoxia is an important regulatory factor in tumorigenesis and is associated with a poor prognosis. Patients with high risk locally advanced disease account for 13-21% of prostate cancer cases and the ten year cancer specific survival rate for these patients is 62%. Patients with hypoxic tumours could benefit from hypoxia modifying therapeutics in addition to radiotherapy. Clinical companion biomarkers are needed to stratify patients who would benefit from hypoxia modifying therapy in addition to radiotherapy. Methods: RNA-seq analysis was performed on prostate cell lines (PNT2-C2, PC-3, LNCaP and DU145) exposed to 1% hypoxia for 24 hrs. A prostate cancer hypoxia gene signature was derived in silico using publicly available prostate gene expression data sets and the RNA-seq data. The biomarker was then independently validated in multiple cohorts of prostate cancer patients with localized diseases receiving prostatectomy alone, prostatectomy plus adjuvant radiotherapy, prostatectomy plus salvage radiotherapy, or definitive radiotherapy alone. Results: In vitro the hypoxia inducible expression of the hypoxia gene signature was tested at 1% and 0.1% oxygen of which 21 of the 28 genes were regulated by hypoxia. Patients stratified as high hypoxia were associated with significantly poorer 5-year biochemical recurrence free survival in patients undergoing prostatectomy alone, prostatectomy plus adjuvant radiotherapy and definitive radiotherapy alone. In multivariable analysis, the biomarker retained significance after correcting for confounding factors including Gleason group, PSA, a molecular classifier, etc. In another cohort of prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy treated patients, the mRNA signature predicts metastasis free survival in both univariable and multivariable analyses. Conclusions: We derived a de novo mRNA signature based on hypoxia-regulated genes. The biomarker consistently predicts biochemical failure and metastasis for prostate cancer patients with localized disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→