MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2794185300 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx180.477

P350 Conventional biomarkers in newly diagnosed Crohn’s disease patients may predict early disease progression

2018· article· en· W2794185300 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Henit Yanai, Idan Goren, Lihi Godny, Shay Ben‐Shachar, Nitsan Maharshak, Yulia Ron, Karin Yadgar, Keren Zonenesain, Tomer Ziv‐Baran, Iris Dotan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCrohn's diseaseNomogramCalprotectinDiseaseLogistic regressionProportional hazards modelCHAIDCohortProspective cohort studyMultivariate analysisStepwise regressionGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseDecision tree

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a heterogeneous progressive disorder. Predicting factors for progression are scarce. We aimed to identify early risk factors for disease progression. A longitudinal, prospective, observational inception cohort, in a tertiary referral centre. Adults suspected of CD, or diagnosed with CD during the preceding six months prior to enrolment were recruited. Clinical and biological markers were obtained at recruitment. Disease progression was defined by indirect measures: either CD-related hospitalisation/surgery or commencing any medical therapy other than 5ASAs. For prediction analysis we focused only on treatment-naïve patients at enrolment, using any data obtained before interventions. Data analysis was performed using data mining methods. Biomarkers were analysed for threshold values by classification and regression trees (CART), and by Chi-square automatic interaction detector (CHAID) methods. We implemented the data into a stepwise forward multivariate Cox regression model. Overall 59 of 157 patients attained a diagnosis of treatment naïve CD: median age at diagnosis was 31.6 (IQR 21.5–46) years, males: 35 (59.3%), Ashkenazi: 22 (37.3%), never smokers: 33 (55.9%). Average BMI was 22.7 ± 4.5 kg/m2. Median follow-up: 15.1 (IQR 5.7–20.2) months. At enrolment median C-reactive protein (CRP) was 12.1 (IQR 3.7–20.6) mg/l and median fecal calprotectin (FC) was 436 (IQR 145–799) µg/gr stool. Montreal classification: L1 36 (63.1%); L2 15 (26.4%); L3 6 (10.5%); L4 5 (8.8%); B1, 48 (85.7%); B2 4 (7.1%); B3 4 (7.1%), and perianal involvement in 6 patients (10.7%). Disease progression was identified in 28 patients (47.5%): hospitalisation 9 (15.3%), surgery 1 (1.7%), medical intervention 26 patients (44.1%). The Cox regression model revealed several biomarkers that were associated with disease progression: ferritin > 47 ng/ml (HR 9.6, p = 0.002), GGT > 17 IU (HR 8.06; p = 0.001), ASCA IgA >2.4 IU (HR 3.4; p = 0.039), BMI < 22 kg/m2 (HR 5.7, p = 0.001), while colonic disease was found to be associated with decreased probability for progression (HR 0.4, p = 0.049). CRP and FC were not predictive of early disease progression. In newly diagnosed CD patients conventional biomarkers, even within normal ranges, maybe be used as strong independent predictors for disease progression. Integration of these measures into a model (creation of a nomogram) will be used to stratify newly diagnosed patients for near risk of progression. Such tools may enable better patient stratification and direct clinicians towards strategic personalised interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→