MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794194966 · doi:10.4000/eccs.975

Redéfinir l’identité canadienne en termes de communautés de mémoire

2017· article· fr· W2794194966 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zilả Bernd

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes canadiennes / Canadian Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les commémorations des 150 ans de la Confédération incitent à la réflexion sur les redéfinitions actuelles des identités canadiennes. Les mobilités culturelles nous mettent au défi de penser au-delà des nationalismes, voire des transnationalismes. Elles nous poussent à envisager des perspectives transculturelles capables de nous guider vers une redéfinition des questions identitaires sans tomber dans des situations perverses d’exclusion. L’objectif de cet article est de partir du concept de « communautés de mémoire » de Pierre Ouellet, proposé dans Testaments, le témoignage et le sacré (2012), pour redéfinir les identités dans les contextes canadien et québécois.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0200.029
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes canadiennes / Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207