De la autonomía a lo común: entrevista a Christian Laval y Pierre Dardot
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta entrevista realizada por Amador Fernández-Savater a Christian Laval y Pierre Dardot aborda la propuesta teórico-política de estos dos autores a propósito de la publicación de su trabajo Commun: Essai sur la révolution au XX/e siecle, editado en castellano por Gedisa enel año 2015 (Común: ensayo sobre la revolución en el S. XXI). Esta conversación a tres, bucea en la vigencia de las propuestas del genuino colectivo Socialismo o Barbarie del que tomaron parte junto a Comelius Castoriadis, atendiendo especialmente al sostenimiento de modelos prácticos en la pretensión del grupo por superar el desarrollo meramente teórico en espacios restringidos al mundo intelectual. Sobrevuela toda la conversación el propio pensamiento de Castoriadis, especialmente su concepción sobre las relaciones entre cultura y política, el análisis de la burocratización del mundo social en el capitalismo, las instituciones y la revolución, anudada al proyecto democrático moderno. En ese marco, emerge la propuesta de Común por una democracia radical capaz de enfrentar la ofensiva neoliberal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".