MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794218062 · doi:10.1093/fs/kny057

<i>Présences, résurgences et oublis du religieux dans les littératures française et québécoise</i> . Sous la direction de <scp>Gilles Dupuis</scp> , <scp>Klaus-Dieter Ertler</scp> et <scp>Alessandro Ferraro</scp> <i>Présences, résurgences et oublis du religieux dans les littératures française et québécoise</i> . Sous la direction de DupuisGilles, ErtlerKlaus-Dieter et FerraroAlessandro. (Canadiana, 18.) Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang, 2017. 260 pp., ill.

2018· article· fr· W2794218062 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Craig Moyes

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)HumanitiesTheme (computing)ArtArt historyHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This volume brings together the proceedings of an international conference held under the same title at the University of Graz in 2014. It is the third collaboration between three important research groups in Quebec/Canadian studies, two of which are located outside Canada: the Centre de recherche interuniversitaire sur la littérature et la culture québécoises (Montreal), the Zentrum für Kanada-Studien (Graz), and the Centro di cultura canadese (Udine). The collection is divided into three roughly equal sections: ‘Présence du religieux dans les littératures de la Nouvelle-France et l’Ancien Régime’; ‘Rémanence du religieux et résurgence du sacré dans la littérature et la culture québécoises’; and ‘Représentation de la judéité et oubli du religieux dans la fiction contemporaine’. Two unusual editorial decisions orient the choice of articles: first, that the theme of religion should be taken in its longue durée, from the colonial period to the contemporary (which has the odd but by no means uninteresting consequence of bringing together Marie de l’Incarnation and Nelly Arcan within the same volume); and second, that works of Québécois literature should be considered under this light ‘in parallel’ with those of metropolitan France. If this second ambition seems somewhat arbitrary and unconvincing given that only four of the fifteen articles treat French authors, the first — at least in the context of Quebec studies — shows itself to be a promising avenue of research indeed. In a field that tends to be weighted towards the literary production of the latter half of the twentieth century, it is a salutary reminder that, for most of its history, French Canada was inseparable from its Catholicism and that the secular nationalism of the Quiet Revolution that has so over-determined its more recent literature represents a relatively recent shift in the interpretative frameworks available to writers. It is noteworthy, however, that in their discussions of religion the authors do not restrict themselves to Catholicism. The first three articles of the collection, which treat seventeenth-century texts (Klaus-Dieter Ertler on the Jesuit Relations from New France; Alessandro Ferraro on female autobiographical narrative; Nicola Gasbarro on the intercultural relations between Jesuits and indigenous peoples), all enlarge (and problematize) the notion of religious experience to encompass diverse forms of spirituality and the sacred. This etymologically ‘catholic’ approach (katholikos meaning ‘universal’, as Gilles Dupuis reminds us in his fascinating article on Jean Marcel’s Triptyque des temps perdus) is pursued in the second section of the collection, where authors as varied as Réjean Ducharme, Nerée Beauchemin, Anne Hébert, Robert Lalonde, Jean Marcel, Nelly Arcan, and Jocelyne Saucier are all examined from a religious point of view that does not simply express (or repress) the dominant ideology of the Church of Rome. The final section displaces this extension of religion, by focusing on its Jewish expression in both French and Québécois literature. Despite the disparate nature of the literary and historical documents studied, the editors’ choice of religion as a lens through which to focus their analyses pays clear dividends to the reader interested in an important aspect of Québécois literary culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207