MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794237901 · doi:10.2116/bunsekikagaku.67.37

Development of an Assay for Diluted Plasma of Fingertip Blood Samples and Its Contribution to Health Care

2018· article· en· W2794237901 on OpenAlexaff
Susumu Osawa, Shinya Sugimoto, I Yonekubo, Miyuki KAJIKI, Kaoru Terashima, Akio Iwasaki

Bibliographic record

VenueBUNSEKI KAGAKU · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicForensic and Genetic Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Care Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth carePlasmaChromatographyChemistryMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

先進国で高齢化社会を最初に向かえる日本の医療費は約42兆円であり,国家予算の約38% に達する.我が国の医療での分析化学の技術は,患者の診断,治療効果の判定,予後の推定,そして健康管理に利用され,世界一の長寿国に貢献している.企業に勤務する社員の多くは健康診断を受ける機会があるが,自営業や家庭の主婦は健診会場にほとんど行くことがない.分析化学の技術を駆使して家庭内で臨床検査が可能な研究開発はされているが,その検査項目はぶどう糖など限定的であり十分に普及しているとは言いがたい.厚生労働省は40歳以上の国民を対象に特定健診(メタボ健診)を実施しているが受診率は47.6% であり,目標の70% には到達していない.著者らは手指からの微量の血液(65 μL)を緩衝液で希釈し,即時に血球と希釈血漿を分離する技術を開発した.希釈された血漿は一週間安定であることから,試料を郵送して病院検査室で用いる生化学自動分析装置で測定することが可能である.希釈された血漿中の成分は採取した検査者の採取量や血球量により変動する.全血の希釈緩衝液に内部標準を添加することで,その希釈率から生体成分の希釈倍率を求め,血漿中の生体成分濃度を求めることができる.また,手指からの末梢血を緩衝液で希釈することにより,フィルターで容易に血漿を血球から分離することが可能となった.さらに希釈された血漿成分は生体内酵素も希釈されることから代謝産物の安定化にも寄与している.これらの血液希釈血漿分離技術を駆使し,希釈血漿150 μLでメタボ健診の14項目の検査を可能とした検査技術とその活用による効果を述べる.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBUNSEKI KAGAKUSame topicForensic and Genetic ResearchFrench-language works237,207