MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794305977 · doi:10.1109/mnet.2018.1700395

Protocol Architectures for IoT Domains

2018· preprint· en· W2794305977 on OpenAlexaff
Jelena Mišić, M. Zulfiker Ali, Vojislav B. Mišić

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Network · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityProxy (statistics)Computer networkInternet of ThingsCacheEnergy consumptionInterconnectionModular designDistributed computingEfficient energy useEmbedded systemDatabaseOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we discuss architectural alternatives for the design of a proxy that interconnects IoT domains running CoAP with the rest of the Internet including micro datacenters and other domains building scalable hierarchical architectures. We assume that the CoAP domain is terminated by an IoT proxy with cache, and we investigate several design alternatives, assuming that the proxy autonomously maintains data freshness. Our analysis indicates that multicast and observe-based proxies perform better than the default POST/GET approach in terms of successful data transmission, round trip delay and energy consumption, with the multicast option having a slight advantage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE NetworkSame topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207