MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794308794 · doi:10.1093/jas/skx026

Cornelis (Kees) Franciscus Maria de Lange (1961–2016): a brief biography

2018· article· en· W2794308794 on OpenAlexafffundabout
John F. Patience, Marie Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsBachelorNutritionistLibrary scienceGerontologyHistoryMedicineArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr. Cornelis Franciscus Maria de Lange, known to all as Kees, the son of Cornelis and Petronella de Lange, was born on 19 April 1961 in the farming community of De Weere, The Netherlands. He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in animal science in 1983 and followed that with a M.Sc. degree in animal nutrition in 1985, both from the Agricultural University in Wageningen, The Netherlands. He then moved to Canada to study with Dr. Willem C. Sauer at the University of Alberta (Edmonton, AB, Canada), graduating with a Ph.D. in animal nutrition in 1988. For 3 yr, he was employed as a Swine Nutritionist and Research and Technical Service Manager with Ralston-Purina Canada in Woodstock, ON, Canada. In 1992, he joined the Prairie Swine Centre (Saskatoon, SK, Canada) as a Research Scientist – Nutrition before moving back to Ontario to join the faculty in the Department of Animal and Poultry Science of the University of Guelph in 1994. He was promoted to Associate Professor in 1998 and then to Full Professor in 2003, a position he held until his death from melanoma on 1 August 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207