MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794384832 · doi:10.6092/issn.2281-4485/7558

Opening a window on the past: paleo-horizons across Pleistocene and Holocene. Madonna della Grotta, Praia a Mare, Southern Italy

2017· article· en· W2794384832 on OpenAlexaff
Stefania Cocco, Vincenzo Caputo Barucchi, Alessandra Negri, Massimo Giovannotti, Andrea Splendiani, Tatiana Fioravanti, Daniele Albertini, Valeria Cardelli, François Courchesne, Giuseppe Corti

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHoloceneWindow (computing)GeologyPleistocenePaleontologyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this study was to identify and characterize three paleo-horizons along a stratigraphic succession embracing sediments from Paleolithic to historic that has been preserved inside a grotto close to the Tyrrhenian Sea in southern Italy. The studied paleo-horizons date back to the transition period between Pleistocene and Holocene, when swift alternations of cold and warm phases profoundly altered the range dynamics of many organisms, including salmonids like Salmo trutta and, consequently, the behavior of the humans that occupied the grotto. Morphological observations and preliminary analysis were run to assess if the paleo-horizons preserved information of the human modified behavior. Results confirmed that one of the three paleo-horizons (Bud horizon, dating back to 10,300 cal YBP) had a strongly affected anthropic origin as it contains the rests of terrestrial (mammals, birds, and snails) and sea food (Salmo trutta and Patella spp.), and showed a hard compaction acquired via hydroconsolidation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.225
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207