TILTING THEORY FOR GORENSTEIN RINGS IN DIMENSION ONE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In representation theory, commutative algebra and algebraic geometry, it is an important problem to understand when the triangulated category $\mathsf{D}_{\operatorname{sg}}^{\mathbb{Z}}(R)=\text{}\underline{\mathsf{CM}}_{0}^{\mathbb{Z}}R$ admits a tilting (respectively, silting) object for a $\mathbb{Z}$ -graded commutative Gorenstein ring $R=\bigoplus _{i\geqslant 0}R_{i}$ . Here $\mathsf{D}_{\operatorname{sg}}^{\mathbb{Z}}(R)$ is the singularity category, and $\text{}\underline{\mathsf{CM}}_{0}^{\mathbb{Z}}R$ is the stable category of $\mathbb{Z}$ -graded Cohen–Macaulay (CM) $R$ -modules, which are locally free at all nonmaximal prime ideals of $R$ . In this paper, we give a complete answer to this problem in the case where $\dim R=1$ and $R_{0}$ is a field. We prove that $\text{}\underline{\mathsf{CM}}_{0}^{\mathbb{Z}}R$ always admits a silting object, and that $\text{}\underline{\mathsf{CM}}_{0}^{\mathbb{Z}}R$ admits a tilting object if and only if either $R$ is regular or the $a$ -invariant of $R$ is nonnegative. Our silting/tilting object will be given explicitly. We also show that if $R$ is reduced and nonregular, then its $a$ -invariant is nonnegative and the above tilting object gives a full strong exceptional collection in $\text{}\underline{\mathsf{CM}}_{0}^{\mathbb{Z}}R=\text{}\underline{\mathsf{CM}}^{\mathbb{Z}}R$ .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it