DAMPAK PEMBANGUNAN WADUK JATIGEDE TERHADAP KEHIDUPAN SOSIAL BUDAYA MASYARAKATNYA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstrakBelakang ini mencuat keresahan masyarakat yang terkena dampak pembangunan Waduk Jatigede. Seolah merupakan kasus baru, padahal masalah Waduk Jatigede sudah berlangsung cukup lama yakni sejak presiden Republik Indonesia, Soekarno. Pembangunan Waduk Jatigede adalah proyek pembuatan pembangkit tenaga listrik. Proyek ini berada di wilayah administrasi Kabupaten Sumedang, Provinsi Jawa Barat, meliputi Kecamatan Jatigede, Wado, Cisitu, Darmaraja, dan Kecamatan Jatinunggal. Penelitian ini menarik karena sejak pertama di mulainya pembangunan waduk sampai sekarang, Januari 2015, belum selesai. Penelitian ini mengupas dampak pembangunan Waduk Jatigede terhadap kehidupan sosial budaya masyarakatnya, yang dibatasi pada masalah ganti rugi, relokasi, dan tinggalan nilai budaya. Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui dampak sosial budaya pembangunan waduk terhadap masyarakatnya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif, metode kajiannya deskriptif analitik. Penelitian di mulai dari sumber pustaka, mencari data lapangan dengan observasi dan wawancara, klasifikasi data, analisis, dan laporan penelitian. Dari penelitian disimpulkan bahwa dampak sosialseperti permasalahan relokasi, ganti rugi, dan masalah tinggalan budaya yang meresahkan warga merupakan imbas dari pembangunan waduk. Permasalahan sebenarnya bisa diminimalisir jika pembangunan tidak tersendat akibat perencanaan kurang matang dan faktor dana. Namun seiring berjalan waktu permasalahan tersebut sedikit demi sedikit dapat ditangani oleh berbagai pihak dan diharapkan tahun 2015 waduk mulai digenangi. AbstractFidgetiness appear at this moment because of the developing of Jatigede Dam. Apparently as a new case, actually this thing has appeared since the first president of Indonesia, Soekarno. The build of Jatigede Dam is the project of generator of electricity power. This project are in the administraton area of Sumedang Regency, West Java Province. Jatigede project involved of five area in five sub-district, there are; Jatigede, Wado, Cisitu, Darmaja, and Jatinunggal Subdistrict. Not all of the area got the effect, only 26 villages. This research arequite interesting because since the Jatigede Dam were built until the years of 2015 the project is not finished. The first problem is related to the unfinished problems of social and cultural. This research purpose is to reveal the effect of Jatigede Dam for life of social cultural society, which focused on claim damages, relocated, and the legacy of cultural values or customs. The research method is qualitative, and the discussing method is descriptive analytic. The step of the research start from library research, finding the field collection with observation and interview, continued with classification the data, analysis and arranged the research report. From this research can be concluded that social impact such as relocated problems, claim damages, and the legacy of the ancestor as the impact of Jatigede building process. Actually, if the building of Jatigede run smoothly, the problems can be minimize. In line with the time, little by little the problems get solved handled by the authority, in this case are the local government or centre government. And the target to settle up all of the problems in the years 2015.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".