MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794430957 · doi:10.2118/190471-ms

Investigation and Observations on the Stability of Water-Oil Ratio WOR during Chemical Floods in Heavy Oil Reservoirs

2018· article· en· W2794430957 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eric Delamaide

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlood mythPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceOil productionCrude oilGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Long periods of up to several years of production at a Water-Oil Ratio (WOR) at or close to 1 have been observed in polymer floods in heavy oil reservoirs in Western Canada. A similar behavior had been noted by some authors in waterflood projects in heavy oil; however, this has never been documented in chemical floods before. Such long periods of WOR stability at low values, with very unfavorable Mobility Ratios, are not expected from theory. The aim of this paper is to review chemical floods in heavy oil reservoirs in Canada to better understand this phenomenon and try and identify the potential mechanisms by investigating reservoir and operational factors. If the phenomenon can be controlled through adequate operational practices, it would allow to operate chemical floods under very favorable WOR conditions for long periods. The production data of hundreds of wells in 8 large scale polymer and ASP floods in heavy oil reservoirs in Western Canada has been reviewed to investigate the occurrence of periods of stable WOR close or equal to 1. A significant number of wells that display this kind of behaviour were identified and studied. The impact of Gas Oil Ratio, oil viscosity, injection rate and other factors was analysed to try and identify some potential factors causing the phenomenon. Long periods of WOR stability at or around 1 have been confirmed in 3 of the 8 chemical floods reviewed; 2 cases are polymer floods and 1 is a mixed polymer/ASP flood. The behaviour has been observed during primary, secondary as well as tertiary polymer flood. There appears to be a link with the injection and liquid production rates i.e. WOR stability occurs in a given range of rates; but no other obvious factors have been identified so far. The existence of long periods (up to several years) of WOR stability around 1 is documented for the first time in chemical floods in heavy oil reservoirs. This behavior is unexpected from theory and deserves further study; if it could be controlled through adequate operational practices, it would allow to operate chemical floods under very favorable WOR conditions for long periods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West AsiaSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207