MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794431345 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.312

A312 POST MARKET USE OF TEDUGLUTIDE IN CANADA IN PATIENTS WITH SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME ON HOME PARENTERAL NUTRITION: THE REAL WORLD SETTING

2018· article· en· W2794431345 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jessica Noelting, Brian Jurewitsch, Leah Gramlich, Donald R. Duerksen, Maitreyi Raman, David Armstrong, Monica Laura Ponta, Olivia Saqui, Celeste Arca-Juico, P Kim, Brooke Stewart, Johane P. Allard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityAlberta HealthUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of CalgarySt. Michael's HospitalToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShort bowel syndromeMedicineParenteral nutritionIntestinal failurePediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with intestinal failure due to short bowel syndrome (SBS) are dependent on parenteral support (PS). Teduglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) agonist, can reduce PS requirement by enhancing absorptive capacity of the remaining intestine. As it was only approved for use in Canada in October 2015 and it is indicated for a very select group of patients, not much is known on real-world experience using this drug in Canada. The aim of this study was to describe the current experience in Canada in using teduglutide. Data was obtained: 1) from a brief survey on the use of teduglutide, distributed to the HPN programs participating in the Canadian HPN Registry and; 2) from the home parenteral nutrition (HPN) registry itself, where patient data are entered prospectively by HPN teams across Canada. If teduglutide was initiated prior to the patient’s baseline entry in the Registry, data was also collected retrospectively. Fifty two patients from 5 provinces were referred by their respective HPN programs for funding of teduglutide. Of these, 21 patients are currently on the drug while 4 had the drug discontinued and 11 were not eligible due to lack of funding. The remaining patients are being assessed or awaiting initiation of the drug. Of those on teduglutide, 18 patients (7 male, 11 female) were entered in the HPN Registry, and, of those who discontinued, 2 (1 male, 1 female) were also entered in the Registry (total: 20). Patients in the Registry are between 26 and 70 years old (mean age 51), with 20cm to 225cm of small bowel and have been on PS from 1 to 29 years (median 5) prior to initiation of the drug. Since initiation of tedulgutide, six patients have discontinued HPN, although 4 of them still receive IV hydration. Of those on teduglutide for 6 and 12 months, PS was reduced by an average of 29% and 43% based on volume and 32% and 34% based on calories, respectively. Fifty-three percent and 82% of patients were able to reduce PS volume by at least 20% after 6 and 12 months of therapy with teduglutide, respectively. The drug was discontinued in two participants due to increased fistula output in one person with uncontrolled Crohn’s disease and increased carcinoembryonic antigen in the other. In patients with intestinal failure due to SBS, teduglutide therapy results in reduced dependence on PS. Given the long term complications associated with PS and the limitations of alternative therapies such as intestinal transplantation, teduglutide is a promising new treatment that has the potential to improve the prognosis of this condition. Further, long term studies are needed to determine the sustainability of this therapy and its side effects. Ontario Medical Supply, Baxter

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFrench-language works237,207