MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794442837 · doi:10.1353/abr.2017.0135

Lizzie Borden Took an Axe

2017· article· en· W2794442837 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bethany Mannon

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican book review/˜The œAmerican book review · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuspectNarrativeInterpretation (philosophy)NewspaperHistoryLiteratureArt historyArtSociologyMedia studiesPhilosophyCriminology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lizzie Borden Took an Axe Bethany Mannon (bio) See What I Have Done Sarah Schmidt Atlantic Monthly Press www.worldswithoutend.com/publisher 324 Pages; Print, $26.00 Lizzie Borden’s trial for the brutal murders of her father and stepmother leaves many questions open to narrative interpretation. Borden was acquitted in 1893, but no other suspect was ever charged. Historical memory, including the rhyme that memorializes her (“Lizzie Borden took an axe…”), regards her as guilty for the two murders. The case is well documented in historical records of the family and their prominent position in the Massachusetts town of Fall River, in contemporaneous newspaper accounts, in extensive testimonies from the investigation and trial, and even in photos of the crime scene, but these sources reveal little about Lizzie’s private life and her possible motive. See What I Have Done expands upon the historical record by filling in these elements, using the techniques of fiction to explore what verifiable history cannot tell us about a nineteenth century woman’s life. Sarah Schmidt’s debut novel imagines 32-year-old Lizzie Borden’s interior life and portrays her as a fragile yet forceful woman who is consumed by the relationships among her family members. See What I Have Done opens with Lizzie looking down at her dead father’s body and calling out “Someone’s killed Father.” Lizzie narrates as doctors, police, and neighbors descend upon the house, questioning her and soon finding the body of her stepmother Abby. Her perspective is feverishly attuned to the smells and tastes of visitors’ bodies, haunted by unsettling childhood memories, and alert to the house itself as she feels it contract, groan, and “move left then right as the heat ground into the walls.” My initial impression was that Lizzie could be either mentally ill and guilty of the murders, or simply tempestuous and innocent of any crime. Schmidt leaves both possibilities open in the early scenes. The novel recalls Margaret Atwood’s Alias Grace (1996), which imagined the interior life and self-narration of Grace Marks, a young servant convicted of a double murder in Toronto in 1843. Alias Grace holds social institutions complicit in violence against vulnerable women, and envisions the ways Marks gains power through revealing and withholding details of her coerced confession. This novel—the most fascinating work of biofiction I have read—explodes gendered categories of guilt and innocence. However, the similarities of the crimes belie the differences in the two women’s lives. Schmidt’s novel echoes Alias Grace at times, but instead of Grace’s canny self-narration we see Lizzie’s distorted, obsessive perceptions of her family. Lizzie’s story is not the most absorbing thread in See What I Have Done, though. Two other historical figures narrate the novel: older sister [End Page 14] Emma Borden and Irish domestic Bridget Sullivan. Their accounts of the days surrounding the murders alternate with Lizzie’s chapters, creating a layered description of the household and the miseries that each female member suffers. We learn about Abby through the other women’s pity for her aging body and annoyance with her heavy, dull presence. Like Lizzie, Emma chafes at her father’s rigidity and resents his remarriage. She recalls her mother’s death and the ways her father and sister thwart her wishes to travel, study art, and create an independent life with a like-minded man. Bridget moves at the periphery of family life, overhearing the sisters’ bickering and accommodating Lizzie’s childish requests. Her experience is that of being simultaneously too close to the appetites and ailments of the family and also isolated, a vent for their frustrations. Like Abby and Emma, she is mired in the household’s summer torpor so that returning to Ireland feels out of reach. Rather than forge bonds to resist patriarchal control, these women withdraw into oppressive solitary worlds. A fourth, fictional narrator introduces a perspective outside of the 92 Second Street house. Lizzie and Emma’s uncle hires Benjamin to confront Andrew Borden about his treatment of his daughters, and Benjamin travels to Fall River the day before the murders. His mobility and his marginal...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican book review/˜The œAmerican book reviewSame topicShort Stories in Global LiteratureFrench-language works237,207