MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Diffusions du plan comptable

2016· book-chapter· fr· W2794458697 on OpenAlexaff
Agnès D’Angio

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAccounting and Organizational Management
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlan (archaeology)Computer scienceGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les premiers plans comptables publiés par les professionnels ou à leur initiative concernent la mécanique et l’énergie : les comités d’organisation des industries mécaniques (1944) et de l’industrie aéronautique (2e éd. en 1945) éditent les leurs, Jean Parenteau, membre de la commission interministérielle de 1941 (et futur membre du CSC/CNC de 1950 à 1976), présente le plan comptable de Charbonnages de France (Lille : Danel, 1948) et un Guide d’application du plan comptable aux organismes de...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooksSame topicAccounting and Organizational ManagementFrench-language works237,207