MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794529017 · doi:10.1093/pch/16.1.9a

Case 2: Weight loss despite tube feeding

2011· article· en· W2794529017 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jodie Ouahed, Natasha Johnson, Herbert Brill

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWeight lossPediatricsWeight gainDepression (economics)LethargyAnemiaInternal medicineGastroenterologyObesityBody weight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 15-year-old boy was referred by his family physician for a body mass index of 14 kg/m2. Previously, he had been following the fifth percentile for weight, despite being at the 50th percentile for height. His medical history was notable for eczema, iron-deficiency anemia and bronchitis. He unintentionally lost 4.5 kg over the past year, coinciding with the beginning of high school. He denied abdominal pain, vomiting, headaches, wheezing, reflux, arthritis, rashes and travels, and he passed formed stools daily. He was hungry, ate a varied diet, and denied concerns with body shape, restricting, binging or purging. Although he wished to gain weight, early satiety limited portion sizes. He was not physically active, but had healthy social and academic interests, and an appropriate mood. His mother had depression, two paternal uncles had celiac disease and his father reportedly had a transient malabsorptive problem as a child. Physical examination was normal aside from obviously low weight. Complete blood count, electrolytes, transaminases, total protein, albumin, thyroid function, antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, ferritin, C-reactive protein, urinalysis, celiac and HIV screens were unremarkable. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed mild chronic gastritis without Helicobacter pylori infection. The patient was instructed to consume high-energy foods plus two cans of Ensure (Abbott Laboratories Ltd, Canada) per day. Although consuming an average of 2260 calories per day during the first five weeks, he only gained 1.1 kg. Over the following six months, despite aggressive calorie supplementation with ongoing suggestions from the dietician, he continued to demonstrate suboptimal weight gain, fluctuating between 44 kg and 46 kg. He was, therefore, admitted to hospital where he developed nonbilious and nonbloody emesis. Radiography of his chest and abdomen were unremarkable, as was an upper gastrointestinal contrast study. Nasogastric feeds were started with an intake of up to 3300 calories per day, gaining only 0.3 kg in the first week of admission. A further diagnostic test revealed the diagnosis. Once the patient was admitted, new morning nausea and emesis suggested another contributing factor. Stool was sent for ova and parasites. All three samples were positive for Enterobius vermicularis. Questioning revealed perianal itching of chronic duration. He was treated with one dose of mebendazole. Tape tests eight and 11 days later were still positive, so he received another dose of mebendazole. After treatment, he showed appropriate sustained weight gain through oral feeds; nasogastric tube feedings were stopped. He gained 7 kg over the subsequent month with a controlled daily intake of 3300 calories. E vermicularis (pinworms) is a common nematode infection, affecting 30% of children worldwide. It is most common in crowded environments, but occurs in all socioeconomic classes and ages with the highest prevalence among five- to 14-year-old children. Pinworms are small, white roundworms that typically inhabit the cecum, ascending colon, appendix and terminal ileum. Infection is via the fecal-oral route when eggs carried on fingernails, clothes, linen and house dust are ingested; dislodged airborne ova are less common. Larvae hatch in the small intestine and mature into adult worms that mate in the cecum and appendix within 36 to 53 days. At night, pregnant female worms migrate to the perineum and deposit up to 150,000 eggs. The ova embryonate within 6 h, and the cycle repeats. Pinworm infection rarely causes serious sequelae. Usually asymptomatic, the most common complaint is pruritus ani, with associated sleep interruption, fatigue and secondary infection from excoriation. With high worm burden, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting may occur. Rarely, children can become anorexic and develop irritability, impaired concentration, enuresis and weight loss. Eosinophilia is not usually observed because tissue invasion is rare. In female patients, pinworms bring colonic bacteria to the perineal area, accounting for recurrent vulvovaginitis and increased urinary tract infections. Worms can also lead to intestinal ulceration, or infect the appendix, genital tract, urinary tract, peritoneum, kidney, liver, spleen and lung. Pinworm infection may present atypically with rectal bleeding, chronic diarrhea and weight loss, mimicking an inflammatory bowel disease. In a retrospective study by Jardine et al (1), 17% of children presenting with these symptoms were diagnosed with E vermicularis infection by colonoscopy, of which 81% had nonspecific colitis histologically. A definitive diagnosis is achieved by the tape test: adhesive tape is pressed against the perianal area, transferring the eggs so they can be microscopically visualized. For highest yield, testing should be performed at night or early morning before bathing and defecating. One tape test detects 50% of infections, but three tests on consecutive mornings detect 90%. Stool samples seldom reveal E vermicularis ova, with a poor sensitivity of 10%, suggestive of a heavy infestation in our patient. First-line treatment for pinworm infection consists of single doses of mebendazole or albendazole. A single 100 mg dose of mebendazole, or 400 mg of albendazole for children older than two years and 100 mg if younger, should be given to the patient and all household members. Doses are often repeated in two weeks to prevent recurrence. Reinfection is common; good hand hygiene, and frequently changing underclothes, bed linens and nightclothes are encouraged. The Great Ormond Street (GOS) criteria characterize food avoidance emotional disorder (FAED) by the following features: weight loss, food avoidance, mood disturbance not accounted for by a primary affective disorder, absence of abnormal cognitions or premorbid preoccupations regarding weight and shape, and lack of organic brain disease or psychosis (2). Our patient's presentation fits this profile well. He continually reported wanting to gain weight and feeling ‘too skinny’, demonstrating no preoccupations or abnormal cognitions regarding weight or shape. The foods he selected while in hospital were uncharacteristic of patients with anorexia, because they contained a high fat content. Although no specific emotional problem was identified, a component of anxiety was suspected given the temporal association with beginning high school and signs of anxiety witnessed by the treating team. In addition, given his role as the ‘skinny child’ within the family, there was a lot of family pressure for him to eat. Before grade 10, he was obliged to return home from school during his lunch hour to have his food intake monitored. FAED may have evolved from a power struggle between him and his parents in the context of what the patient perceived as unnecessary pressure to eat. Treatment for FAED consists of caloric supplementation in the context of a multidisciplinary team geared toward patients with eating disorders, with weight restoration to promote normal growth and development. If tube feeding is indicated, transition to normal food by mouth should be the eventual outcome, and family-based treatment should be attempted. When a patient is unable to gain weight despite caloric supplementation, compounding organic etiologies must be thoroughly investigated, even in the face of pre-existing emotional disorders such as FAED. E vermicularis is one of the most common nematode infections in children, is diagnosed by the tape test, and requires treatment of the patient and his/her entire household. Most cases of pinworms are asymptomatic; however, symptomatic presentations vary widely, from typical pruritis ani to atypical presentations mimicking inflammatory bowel disease. Adolescents may deny symptoms that they regard as embarrassing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0100.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207