MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794529086 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby015.198

O2.8. TRAJECTORIES OF NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTIONING OVER TIME IN YOUTH AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK WHO DO AND DO NOT TRANSITION TO PSYCHOSIS

2018· article· en· W2794529086 on OpenAlexaff
Kristen A. Woodberry, William S. Stone, Daniel I. Shapiro, Cole Chokran, Jean Addington, Carrie E. Bearden, Kristin S. Cadenhead, Tyrone D. Cannon, Barbara A. Cornblatt, Thomas H. McGlashan, Daniel H. Mathalon, Diana O. Perkins, Ming T. Tsuang, Elaine F. Walker, Scott W. Woods, Larry J. Seidman

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProdromeNeurocognitivePsychosisPsychologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)CognitionClinical psychologyVerbal memoryNeuropsychologyPsychiatryCognitive skillWorking memoryCognitive declineCognitive remediation therapyMedicineDementia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In spite of evidence for the premorbid and prodromal onset of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, there is some limited evidence to suggest that deficits may progress with psychosis onset. Cognitive remediation in youth at risk for psychosis is being touted as an opportunity not only to remediate deficits but to potentially prevent this progression. Yet trajectories of cognitive functioning over time remain poorly understood in youth at risk, including the degree to which age at assessment or illness onset, sociodemographic factors, or symptom progression influence these trajectories. The North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS) -2 collected data on an extensive battery of neuropsychological (NP) tests at baseline, one year, two years, and post-conversion in a sample of clinical high risk (CHR) youth and healthy comparison (HC) subjects ages 12–35 (N= 960, 92% of the full sample) followed clinically for up to 2 years. NP data were available for 694 at CHR and 265 HC. Linear mixed effects analyses were used to test the effects of group, age, gender, age of onset, maternal education, and clinical outcome on cognitive trajectories. Those who transitioned to a psychotic disorder over the course of follow-up performed significantly below those who did not and well below healthy comparisons. Tasks reliant on attention, visual and auditory working memory, visuospatial and verbal memory, and processing speed best differentiated those who transitioned from those who did not at one year (Cohen’s d from -0.33 to -0.54). Discrepancies from normal functioning on these tests were generally large (Cohen’s d from -0.67 to -1.02) consistent with findings for first episode samples. Although clinical outcome was not associated with a significantly different trajectory over time on any cognitive domain, these are likely due to high rates of conversion in this sample within the first year. Predictors of different trajectories will be presented. These data from one of the largest CHR studies to date suggest that much of the neuropsychological dysfunction in major psychotic disorders is present early in the course of illness and prior to its full expression. However, trajectories are highly heterogeneous. More frequent assessment prior to and during the onset of illness are needed to fully understand the cognitive correlates of psychosis onset and the implications for early intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207