Synthesis: PLUTONS: Investigating the relationship between pluton growth and volcanism in the Central Andes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Central Andes is a key global location to study the enigmatic relation between volcanism and plutonism because it has been the site of large ignim briteforming eruptions during the past several million years and currently hosts the world's largest zone of silicic partial melt in the form of the Alti plano Puna Magma (or Mush) Body (APMB) and the Southern Puna Magma Body (SPMB).In this themed issue, results from the recently completed PLUTONS project are synthesized.This project focused an interdisciplinary study on two regions of largescale surface uplift that have been found to represent ongoing movement of magmatic fluids in the middle to upper crust.The loca tions are Uturuncu in Bolivia near the center of the APMB and Lazufre on the Chile Argentina border, on the edge of the SPMB.These studies use a suite of geological, geochemical, geophysical (seismology, gravity, surface defor ma tion, and electromagnetic methods), petrological, and geomorphological techniques with numerical modeling to infer the subsurface distribution, quantity, and movements of magmatic fluids, as well as the past history of eruptions.Both Uturuncu and Lazufre show separate geophysical anomalies in the upper, middle, and lower crust (e.g., low seismic velocity, low resistiv ity, etc.) indicating multiple distinct reservoirs of magma and/or hydrothermal fluids with different physical properties.The characteristics of the geophysical anomalies differ somewhat depending on the technique used-reflecting the different sensitivity of each method to subsurface melt (or fluid) of different compositions, connectivity, and volatile content and highlight the need for integrated, multidisciplinary studies.While the PLUTONS project has led to significant progress, many unresolved issues remain and new questions have been raised.GEOSPHERE
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".