T46. TARGETING THE IMMUNE SYSTEM TO TREAT DEPRESSION AND NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS IN SCHIZOPHRENIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Negative symptoms consist of impaired quality of life, social isolation, reduced emotional responsiveness, self-neglect and anhedonia, which have been categorised into avolition-apathy and expressive deficits sub-domains. The treatment of negative symptoms remains a challenge. Depression is commonly seen in schizophrenia and previous findings have suggested a relationship between depression and negative symptoms via the avolition-apathy sub-domain, (Barnes et al., 2016). It is possible this is the result of a common aetiology, distinct from expressive deficit or other symptoms of schizophrenia. Immune dysfunction has been implicated in both psychotic and depressive illnesses; increased circulating pro-inflammatory markers (such as IL-6, TNF-α & CRP). This suggests a novel target for treatments. A putative neuroprotective role of minocycline has been suggested via reducing microglial activation, and decrease in the production of cytokines including IL-6. Minocycline has been shown to be effective in the treatment of negative symptoms (Xiang et al., 2017) and depression (Soczynska et al., 2012). Within schizophrenia, we predict that that minocycline will lead to a longitudinal improvement in depression and the avolition-apathy sub-domain of negative symptoms Data from the BeneMin study will be presented. BeneMin recruited 207 patients with a current research diagnosis of schizophrenia within 5 years of onset and randomised to minocycline (300mg/day) or matching placebo for 12 months adjunctive to antipsychotic medication. For this analysis the primary outcome variable is the negative symptom subscale from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scales (and broken down into avolition-apathy and expressive deficits sub-domains), Calgary Depression Scale in Schizophrenia (CDSS) and circulating IL-6, TNF-α and CRP over 4-time points 2, 6, 9, and 12 months. At baseline, 40% were depressed (mean CDSS score = 5). The mean avolition-apathy PANSS score was 9.5 and expressive deficits was 9, and was comparable across placebo and minocycline arms. Preliminary results show that markers of inflammation were low in both treatment arms, compared with previous research (baseline CRP Md = 1.45, IL-6 Md = .57, TNF-α Md = 2.43) and this was comparable across depressed and non-depressed patients. TNF-α was significantly associated with expressive-deficits (B = .75, p = .005). Conversely, no marker of inflammation was associated with avolition-apathy or depression. However, in four linear mixed effect models across the 2, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up assessments compared with placebo, minocycline had no effect on total negative symptoms, avolition-apathy, expressive deficits or depression. Further analysis stratifying patients by depression scores and markers of inflammation will be presented. Preliminary results indicate that minocycline does not lead to a reduction in avolition-apathy or depression in early schizophrenia. This may be the result of a medicated, sample recruited within 5 years of illness onset, and low levels of depression. Future studies should target depression in psychosis as a primary aim with samples of individuals with increased inflammatory response to fully investigate minocycline’s potential in targeted intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".