MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794563381 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby016.442

T166. SPATIAL INCOHERENCE OF LARGE-SCALE CORTICAL NETWORKS RELATES TO FORMAL THOUGHT DISORDER IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: A 7T MRI-BASED THICKNESS STUDY

2018· article· en· W2794563381 on OpenAlexaff
Lena Palaniyappan, Ali Al‐Radaideh, Penny Gowland, Peter F. Liddle

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Salience (neuroscience)PsychologyNeurosciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thickness of cerebral cortex varies across individuals as well as across different regions within an individual. Shared trophic or plastic influences such as repeated task-related recruitment of extant brain regions results in morphological covariance within large-scale brain networks. Pathological processes disrupting functional co-activation can result in higher than expected degree of variability within large-scale networks in an individual level, resulting in spatial incoherence. We studied spatial incoherence of cortical thickness in 17 cortical networks identified on the basis of well-known patterns of intrinsic connectivity, to identify the spatially incoherent networks and relate them to differences in severity of thought disorder among patients with schizophrenia. Ultra-high field 7T anatomical MRI scans (MPRAGE) were obtained from 20 subjects in a clinically stable, medicated early stage of schizophrenia, and 19 sex, parental socioeconomic-status and age matched healthy controls. Cortical thickness was estimated using Freesurfer v5.0, across 17 networks based on the parcellation scheme of Yeo et al. We computed within-network coefficient of variation in thickness (CVT) across vertices that constitute each network. Higher CVT of a network in a subject indicates higher spatial incoherence within the network for that individual. Independent 2-tailed t-tests were used to compare CVT of 17 networks between the 2 groups with FDR-corrected p=0.05 considered as statistically significant. We related CVT of affected networks to the scores of positive and negative Formal Thought Disorder measured using Thought and Language Index in patients. Salience Network (aka Ventral Attention Network as per Yeo atlas), Default Mode Network and Central Executive Network (aka dorsal Attention Network in Yeo atlas) showed most significant reduction in MRI-derived cortical thickness (networks #8, #12, #15 as well as #16 of Yeo atlas). Only the Salience and Executive Networks (network #8 and #12) showed higher coefficient of variation in patients compared to controls, indicating either a failure of coordinated maturation or co-ordinated function. Higher spatial incoherence of Salience Network related to reduced mean thickness of Central Executive Network in patients with schizophrenia; this relationship was not seen in healthy controls (Fisher’s z test, p=0.02). Both higher coefficient of variation in Salience Network and lower mean thickness in Central Executive Network predicted the severity of positive but not negative thought disorder scores. Our results indicate that (1) large-scale cortical networks involved in information processing (Salience and Executive Networks) show spatial incoherence in schizophrenia (2) the degree of spatial incoherence relates to the severity of disorganisation of thoughts and language in patients. Spatial incoherence may be the result of a dysmaturational or functional dysplastic effect reflecting inefficient cortical recruitment in schizophrenia. Within-subject morphological variability carries useful information that can potentially explain the elusive neural basis of complex symptoms such as formal thought disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207