Allogeneic iPSC-Derived RPE Cell Graft Failure Following Transplantation Into the Subretinal Space in Nonhuman Primates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To characterize the intraocular immune response following transplantation of iPS-derived allogeneic RPE cells into the subretinal space of non-immune-suppressed rhesus macaques. Methods: GFP-labeled allogeneic iPS-derived RPE cells were transplanted into the subretinal space of one eye (n = 6), and into the contralateral eye 1 day to 4 weeks later, using a two-stage transretinal and transscleral approach. Retinas were examined pre- and post-surgery by color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. Animals were euthanized between 2 hours and 7 weeks following transplantation. T-cell (CD3), B-cell (CD20), and microglial (Iba1) responses were assessed immunohistochemically. Results: Cells were delivered into the subretinal space in all eyes without leakage into the vitreous. Transplanted RPE cells were clearly visible at 4 days after surgery but were no longer detectable by 3 weeks. In localized areas within the bleb containing transplanted cells, T- and B-cell infiltrates and microglia were observed in the subretinal space and underlying choroid. A T-cell response predominated at 4 days, but converted to a B-cell response at 3 weeks. By 7 weeks, few infiltrates or microglia remained. Host RPE and choroid were disrupted in the immediate vicinity of the graft, with fibrosis in the subretinal space. Conclusions: Engraftment of allogeneic RPE cells failed following transplantation into the subretinal space of rhesus macaques, likely due to rejection by the immune system. These data underscore the need for autologous cell sources and/or confirmation of adequate immune suppression to ensure survival of transplanted RPE cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".