Deficiency of the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase RBCK1 Causes Diffuse Brain Polyglucosan Accumulation and Neurodegeneration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Glycogen synthesis is vital, malstructure resulting in precipitation and accumulation into neurotoxic polyglucosan bodies (PBs). One well-understood mechanism of PB generation is glycogen branching enzyme deficiency (GBED). Less understood is Lafora disease (LD), resulting from absence of the glycogen phosphatase laforin or the E3 ubiquitin ligase malin, and accumulation of hyperphosphorylated PBs. LD afforded first insight that glycogen sphericity depends on more than adequate branching activity. Unexpectedly, deficiencies of the Linear Ubiquitin Chain Assembly Complex (LUBAC) components RBCK1 and HOIP result in PBs in muscle tissues. Here we analyzed nervous system phenotypes of mice lacking RBCK1 and find profuse PB accumulations in brain and spinal cord with extensive neurodegeneration and neurobehavioral deficits. Brain glycogen in these mice is characterized by long chains and hyperphosphorylation, similar to LD. Like in LD, glycogen synthase and branching enzyme are unaltered. Regional PB distribution mirrors LD and not GBED. Perisynaptic PB localization is unlike LD or GBED. The results indicate that RBCK1 is part of a system supplementing laforin-malin in regulating glycogen architecture including in unique neuronal locales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".