Preserving Privacy in Web Applications Through Traffic Padding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Web-based applications are gaining popularity as they require less client-side resources and are easier to deliver and maintain. However, including the Internet as an integral part of the application also poses new privacy challenges. In particular, recent research revealed that many high profile Web applications might cause sensitive user inputs to be leaked from encrypted traffic due to side-channel attacks exploiting unique patterns in packet sizes and timing. Naive solutions, such as random padding and packet-size rounding, may incur prohibitive communication overhead while still failing to guarantee sufficient privacy protection. In this chapter, we first observe an interesting similarity between this privacy-preserving traffic padding (PPTP) issue and another well-studied problem, privacy-preserving data publishing (PPDP). Based on such a similarity, we present a formal PPTP model encompassing the privacy requirements, padding costs, and padding methods. We then formulate PPTP problems and design efficient heuristic algorithms. Finally, we confirm the effectiveness and efficiency of our algorithms through experiments using real-world Web applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".