MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794621965 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2014-0004

APPLICATION OF A POLYGENERATION OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE FOR A HOSPITAL IN NORTHERN ONTARIO

2014· article· en· W2794621965 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Alberto Romero, Mónica Carvalho, Dean L. Millar

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCogenerationElectricityInteger programmingLinear programmingGridNatural gasEngineeringWaste managementOperations managementMathematical optimizationEnvironmental scienceElectricity generationElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An optimization technique based on Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) was applied to a hospital located in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. The energy services included electricity, heat, steam, and coolth. Different options for the system’s operation were also considered in the optimization procedure. The optimization model determines the optimal configuration of the polygeneration system and the best operational strategy. The primary objective for optimization is to minimize the hospital’s annual energy costs. This objective can be achieved by consuming low-priced natural gas, operating the gas engines at full load to generate electricity, and selling all of this electricity into the provincial grid, which ensures the hospital’s eligibility to receive government payments for cogeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicProcess Optimization and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207