MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794638413

The importance of tailings management

2015· article· en· W2794638413 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kasia Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsDewateringSustainabilityTailings damEngineeringWaste managementBusinessMining engineeringGeotechnical engineeringEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In light of the growing need for sustainable mining, tailings management is gaining more attention. Finnish technology company Outotec Oyj recently announced that it had purchased Canada-based Kovit Engineering Ltd, which specialises in surface and underground mine tailings solutions. The acquisition, which was completed for an undisclosed sum, complements Outotec's existing dewatering and tailings treatment solutions and services business. According to Johan Gron, vice president of Outotec's dewatering business, there has been a higher industry interest in more advanced tailings management, such as thickened tailings, paste and filter dry stack dewatering systems, as companies attempt to overcome sustainability issues. These include conventional tailings management related risks, environmental impact, social responsibility and economics. [We expect] more forward thinking solutions, including integrated tailings management from one supplier, larger dewatering plants and innovative tailings dewatering and handling solutions, including water management and treatment, Gron said.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207