MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794645006 · doi:10.1142/s0219455418501286

Numerical Simulation of Dynamic Stability of Fractional Stochastic Systems

2018· article· en· W2794645006 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLyapunov exponentNormalization (sociology)MathematicsMoment (physics)Applied mathematicsStatistical physicsSecond moment of areaLyapunov equationMathematical analysisBounded functionComputer simulationControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemComputer sciencePhysicsClassical mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The modern theory of stochastic dynamic stability is founded on two main exponents: the largest Lyapunov exponent and moment Lyapunov exponent. Since any fractional viscoelastic system is indeed a system with memory, data normalization during iterations will disregard past values of the response and therefore the use of data normalization seems not appropriate in numerical simulation of such systems. A new numerical simulation method is proposed for determining the [Formula: see text]th moment Lyapunov exponent, which governs the [Formula: see text]th moment stability of the fractional stochastic systems. The largest Lyapunov exponent can also be obtained from moment Lyapunov exponents. Examples of the two-dimensional fractional systems under wideband noise and bounded noise excitations are presented to illustrate the simulation method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Structural Stability and DynamicsSame topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207