MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2794651804 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2017-0279

Alteration of <i>DACH1</i> methylation patterns in lung cancer contributes to cell proliferation and migration

2018· article· en· W2794651804 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yongjie Feng, Lin Wang, Mingyong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSoochow UniversityGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMethylationLung cancerDNA methylationTransactivationAdenocarcinomaCancer researchBiologyDemethylationApoptosisCell growthA549 cellTransfectionCancerTranscription factorGene expressionPathologyGeneMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80%-85% of total lung cancer cases. Dachshund homolog 1 (DACH1), is a protein encoded by the DACH1 gene in humans. DACH1 inhibits lung adenocarcinoma invasion and tumor growth but has a lower expression in NSCLC. To investigate the mechanisms of decreased DACH1 expression, its DNA methylation patterns were investigated. The results showed a higher methylation rate in NSCLC compared with the adjacent normal lung tissues. Cell transfection experiments showed that increased methylation impaired transcription factor transactivation. In vivo demethylation treatment and overexpression of DACH1 increased apoptosis and decreased migration and invasion in NSCLC A549 cells. Our research provides new insight into NSCLC pathogenesis and identifies a new therapeutic target.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell Biology→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→