MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794677105 · doi:10.1049/iet-cds.2017.0327

Design techniques of all‐digital arithmetic units for time‐mode signal processing

2018· article· en· W2794677105 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Circuits Devices & Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdderArithmeticIntegratorComputer scienceSignal processingDigital signal processingElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study provides a comprehensive treatment of the design techniques of all‐digital arithmetic units for time‐mode signal processing. The arithmetic units investigated include time polarity detectors, time absolute‐value generators, time adders, time baluns, time amplifiers, time quantisers, time registers, and time integrators. The principle, circuit implementation, constraints and limitations of these units are investigated in detail. An emphasis is given to time adders and time integrators. An in‐depth study of time adders constructed from switched delay units, dual discharge paths, and unidirectional gated delay lines is provided. It is followed with the presentation of three time registered evolved from these time adders. Three time integrators developed from the preceding time adders and time registers are studied and their characteristics are compared. Finally, the design of a first‐order time‐to‐digital converter utilising these arithmetic units is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it