MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794692280

Where is Here? Canadian Children's Literature

2008· article· fr· W2794692280 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roderick McGillis

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Children's Literature / Littérature canadienne pour la jeunesse · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophyArt history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, Roderick McGillis considere la notion d'espace geographique dans plusieurs oeuvres recentes au Canada anglais. Ce qui sent de prototype, au fond, dans cet etablissement de l'ici canadien, c'est la duplicite de Jacob deux-deux de Mordecai Richler. Le nom meme du heros semble indiquer son hesitation entre l'espace reve de la maturite et celui de l'enfance incompetente. Il est possible ensuite de suivre cette duplicite dans de nombreuses autres oeuvres, dont celles de Monica Hughes, Ann Walsh, Jean Little et Ruth Nichols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.022
Science and technology studies0.0310.018
Scholarly communication0.0110.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Children's Literature / Littérature canadienne pour la jeunesseSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207