From “Souvenirs” to “Recollections”: Amelia Opie and the Practice of Self-translation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As scholars have shown, Amelia Opie’s political views altered over time from radicalism to moderation; however, her retrospective travel memoir “Recollections of a Visit to Paris in 1802” (1831–32) frustrates straightforward readings of her increasing conservatism. By the time “Recollections” was published, Opie was in her sixties, a Quaker, and primarily a didactic writer and yet in her travelogue, she reflects sympathetically upon her past radical leanings. A comparison of “Recollections” and “Souvenirs d’une visite à Paris en 1802,” a draft manuscript of “Recollections” written in French, reveals Opie’s practice of self-translation. In revising the French “Souvenirs” into the English “Recollections,” Opie addressed temporal, linguistic, cultural, and generic changes between 1802 and 1831 by crafting a traveler persona that combines her older maturity and her youthful naïveté. This fluidity of persona and history in “Recollections” provided a framework for Opie to construct didactic stories about foreign exchange.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".