MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794754416 · doi:10.2118/190180-ms

Exploring the Upper Limit of Oil Viscosity for Polymer Flood in Heavy Oil

2018· article· en· W2794754416 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViscosityOil viscosityPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceFlood mythOil fieldComputer scienceGeologyPhysicsGeographyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Large scale polymer flooding projects in heavy oil are now ongoing in several countries and numerous other projects are at the pilot or design stages. However, there is currently no guideline for the maximum acceptable oil viscosity, one of the important parameters in the screening of new projects. Standard screening criteria do not take the latest field results into account and more recent guidelines rely mostly on viscosity averages whereas they should focus on the extreme values instead. Since the laboratory can only provide little help to settle this issue we propose to examine current field projects for guidance. To the best of the author's knowledge, the Pelican Lake and the Seal polymer floods, both in Canada, are operating in the highest oil viscosity ranges; moreover, the data is public and can easily be accessed. We have therefore examined the performances of polymer injection in the highest ranges of oil viscosity in both fields to get an understanding of the limits. This involved first the identification of the highest oil viscosity patterns, then the estimation of the live oil viscosity during the polymer flood in these patterns and finally the performances of the polymer flood. Viscosity measurements are notoriously difficult and not always very reliable in heavy oil and the evaluation of in-situ viscosity is even more difficult; therefore, we used ranges of viscosity rather than definite values. The observations from Pelican Lake and Seal seem in good agreement and suggest that polymer flood is still feasible and can provide an acceleration in production for live oil viscosities up to 10,000-12,000 cp. There is little experience beyond these values, but it appears that for higher ranges of viscosity polymer injection becomes much more difficult; in Seal polymer flood does not appear to be working satisfactorily in oil viscosities above 14,000 cp. To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first time that the issue of maximum oil viscosity is investigated in such a manner. Although these results are preliminary and would require further confirmation from other field cases, this paper will provide guidance to engineers screening heavy oil reservoirs for potential application of polymer flood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it