Network-Based Biomarkers Enable Cross-Disease Biomarker Discovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Biomarkers lie at the heart of precision medicine, biodiversity monitoring, agricultural pathogen detection, amongst others. Surprisingly, while rapid genomic profiling is becoming ubiquitous, the development of biomarkers almost always involves the application of bespoke techniques that cannot be directly applied to other datasets. There is an urgent need for a systematic methodology to create biologically-interpretable molecular models that robustly predict key phenotypes. We therefore created SIMMS: an algorithm that fragments pathways into functional modules and uses these to predict phenotypes. We applied SIMMS to multiple data-types across four diseases, and in each it reproducibly identified subtypes, made superior predictions to the best bespoke approaches, and identified known and novel signaling nodes. To demonstrate its ability on a new dataset, we measured 33 genes/nodes of the PIK3CA pathway in 1,734 FFPE breast tumours and created a four-subnetwork prediction model. This model significantly out-performed existing clinically-used molecular tests in an independent 1,742-patient validation cohort. SIMMS is generic and can work with any molecular data or biological network, and is freely available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/SIMMS .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".