Conformational dynamics of Light-Harvesting Complex II in a native membrane environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes of higher plants, moss and green algae can undergo dynamic conformational transitions, which have been correlated to their ability to adapt to fluctuations in the light environment. Herein, we demonstrate the application of solid-state NMR spectroscopy on native, heterogeneous thylakoid membranes of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii ( Cr) and on Cr Light-Harvesting Complex II (LHCII) in thylakoid lipid bilayers to detect LHCII conformational dynamics in its native membrane environment. We show that membrane-reconstituted LHCII contains selective sites that undergo fast, large-amplitude motions, including the phytol tails of two chlorophylls. Protein plasticity is also observed in the N-terminal stromal loop and in protein fragments facing the lumen, involving sites that stabilize the xanthophyll-cycle carotenoid violaxanthin and the two luteins. The results report on the intrinsic flexibility of LHCII pigment-protein complexes in a membrane environment, revealing putative sites for conformational switching. In thylakoid membranes, fast dynamics of protein and pigment sites is significantly reduced, which suggests that in their native organelle membranes, LHCII complexes are locked in specific conformational states. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Photosynthetic Light-Harvesting Complexes undergo dynamic conformational transitions that regulate the capacity of the light-harvesting antenna. We demonstrate the application of solid-state (ss)NMR spectroscopy to investigate the structural dynamics of LHCII, the most abundant LHC complex of plants and algae, in native membranes. Selective dynamic protein and pigment residues are identified that are putative sites for a conformational switch.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".