MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794894065 · doi:10.30827/dreh.v0i13.7240

Canción, poesía y danza: un análisis de las elecciones realizadas por alumnos de magisterio (2011 - 2017) en las Universidades de Mallorca

2018· article· en· W2794894065 on OpenAlex
Irina Coromoto Capriles González

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuee-rph (University of Granada) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth, Education, and Physical Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En la asignatura “Representación Escénica” del Grado de Educación Infantil en la Universidad de las Islas Baleares y el Centro de Estudios Superiores Alberta Giménez de Mallorca, los alumnos eligen libremente una canción, un poema y una danza que presentan ante sus compañeros demostrando competencia artística. 
\nLos 629 registros obtenidos de estas actividades permiten analizar: los gustos y preferencias de los alumnos (géneros, artistas, lengua y contenido), la influencia de los mass media, el uso de nuevas tecnologías, y la importancia de la educación informal en la adquisición de los conocimientos necesarios para llevarlas a cabo. Las justificaciones de los alumnos incluyen, desde vínculos afectivos (familiares, pareja, amigos), historia personal, moda, estudios previos (formales y no formales) hasta la identificación con valores regionales de lengua y cultura.
\nABSTRACT
\nIn the subject "Performing Arts in childhood education” that is taught in the Education Degree of Balearic Island University and in Alberta Giménez University Center, students should freely choose a song, a poem and a type of dance. They must perform by heart and demonstrate artistic competence. They provide written data and justification of their choices. Through study of 629 records, we analyse students' tastes and preferences regarding styles and performers (titles, genres, language, text content), influence of mass media culture, the use of new technologies, and the importance of informal education in acquiring the knowledge necessary to carry them out. It is evidenced the little influence of formal education on the choices and skills presented. The justifications include, from affective ties (family, couple, friends), personal history, fashion, previous studies (formal and non-formal) to identification with regional values of language and culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it