MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794909455 · doi:10.2118/190212-ms

Nanoparticle-Enhanced Surfactant Floods to Unlock Heavy Oil

2018· article· en· W2794909455 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPulmonary surfactantEmulsionChemical engineeringOil in placeNanoparticleAqueous solutionEnhanced oil recoveryAqueous two-phase systemChemistryMaterials scienceChromatographyOrganic chemistryPetroleum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Thermal and solvent-based EOR methods are not applicable in many of thin post-CHOPS heavy oil reservoirs in Western Canada. Alkaline-surfactant flooding has been suggested as an alternative to develop these reservoirs. The main mechanism behind these processes has been attributed to emulsion-assisted conformance control due to the effect of synthetic and/or natural surfactants. Because nanoparticles (NPs) offer some advantages in emulsion stabilization, here we combine surface-modified silica NPs and anionic surfactants to enhance the efficiency of heavy oil chemical floods. Based on the results of bulk fluid screening experiments, in the absence of surface-modified silica NP surfactant concentration should be tuned at the CMC (between 1 and 1.5 wt. %) to achieve the highest amount of emulsion. These emulsions are much less viscous than the originating heavy oil. However, at surfactant concentrations far from the CMC, complete phase separation occurs 24 hours after preparation. In the presence of surface-modified silica NP this emulsification was achieved at much lower surfactant concentration. The mixture of 0.1 wt. % anionic surfactant and 2 wt. % surface-modified silica NP produce a homogeneous emulsion of heavy oil in an aqueous phase. This observation was not observed when aqueous phase contains only either 0.1 wt. % anionic surfactant or 2 wt. % silica NP. Preliminary tertiary chemical floods with water containing 0.1 wt. % surfactant and 2 wt. % surface-modified silica NP yielded an incremental oil recovery of 48 % OOIP, which is remarkably higher than that of either surfactant or NP floods with incremental recoveries of 16 and 36 % OOIP, respectively. Tertiary recovery efficiency, defined as ratio of incremental recovery factor to maximum pressure gradient during the tertiary flood, is six times greater for the surfactant/NP mixture than for the surfactant-only flood. This enhancement in recovery efficiency is of great interest for field applications where high EOR and large injectivity are desired.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it