Entre internationalisme et patriotisme : les slaves et l’ethnogenèse des Moldaves dans l’historiographie soviétique de 1924 à 1940
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse la place réservée aux Slaves dans le discours sur l’ethnogenèse des Moldaves, apparu dans l’historiographie soviétique avec le concept de groupe ethnique moldave. Entre 1924 et le milieu des années 1930, la question de l’individualité ethnique des Moldaves reste marginale. En raison du rejet du nationalisme russe et de l’idéologie panslave, même dans les rares études consacrées à l’ethnogenèse des Moldaves, on n’insiste pas sur le rôle particulier des Slaves. La situation change au milieu des années 1930, avec le retour du panslavisme et du nationalisme russe. Les auteurs soviétiques mettent en lumière le concept de groupe ethnique moldave et insistent sur les liens profonds qui unissent la Moldavie et le monde slave oriental. En outre, presque tous les auteurs soviétiques sont prêts à présenter les Moldaves comme des Ukrainiens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".