MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794983838 · doi:10.1002/app.46485

The use of amylose‐rich starch nanoparticles in emulsion polymerization

2018· article· en· W2794983838 on OpenAlexafffund
Shidan Cummings, Michael F. Cunningham, Marc A. Dubé

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAmyloseStarchMonomerPolymer chemistryAcrylic acidEmulsion polymerizationGraftingAcrylatePolymerizationMethyl methacrylateButyl acrylateEmulsionChemical engineeringChemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Regenerated starch nanoparticles (RSNPs) produced from dent corn, an amylose‐rich source of starch, are added to an emulsion polymerization. To reduce or eliminate the challenges of polymerizing in the presence of amylose‐rich starch, a seeded, semibatch, monomer‐starved approach is used. To prevent the accumulation of water soluble amylose in the aqueous phase, reaction with a hydrophobic compatibilizing monomer, butyl acrylate, is used prior to the primary butyl acrylate/methyl methacrylate/acrylic acid feed. In addition, an elevated initiator concentration is used in the seed stage to reduce the molecular weight of the soluble starch and promote grafting. The procedure yields a 100.0 cp latex with 40 wt % solids, 25 wt % RSNP loading, and 40 wt % incorporation. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135 , 46485.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207