MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2794986056 · doi:10.1039/c8cc01866a

Unexpected phase separation in Li<sub>1−x</sub>Ni<sub>0.5</sub>Mn<sub>1.5</sub>O<sub>4</sub> within a porous composite electrode

2018· article· en· W2794986056 on OpenAlexafffund
Mi Lu, Jian Wang, Haitao Fang, Yongfeng Hu, Jigang Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Communications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)Saskatoon Medical Imaging
FundersNational Research Council CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsElectrodeMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Composite numberPhase (matter)PorosityTransmission electron microscopyCrystallographyNanotechnologyChemistryPhysical chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ni oxidation state in Li1-xNi0.5Mn1.5O4 (LNMO) within a composite electrode mapped by soft X-ray scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM) has shown unexpected distinct variations in phase separation among and within individual battery particles, which has been experimentally correlated to both their morphology and interface structure for the first time. The obtained new insights will assist the further development of long-life high voltage LNMO batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Communications→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→