MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Avaliação familiar de mulheres transexuais com hiv/aids à luz do modelo Calgary

2018· article· pt· W2794997982 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ana Carolina Paiva Ferreira, Ednaldo Cavalcante de Araújo, Paula Daniella de Abreu, Eliane Maria Ribeiro de Vasconcelos, Karolline de Souza Leão Valença, Maria Eduarda da Silva Santana

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Enfermagem UFPE on line · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)MedicineParticipant observationPsychologySociologyArtFamily medicineAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMOObjetivo: analisar a organização da família de mulheres jovens transexuais, com HIV/AIDS à luz do Modelo Calgary. Método: pesquisa qualitativa, descritiva, exploratória. A população do estudo será composta por mulheres transexuais, jovens, tendo por cenário um ambulatório de HIV/AIDS de um hospital de referência. A coleta de dados será por intermédio de entrevistas individuais, a partir de um roteiro semiestruturado contendo questões pertinentes aos objetivos do estudo. As entrevistas serão submetidas à análise no software Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires (IRAMUTEQ) versão 0.7 e software Genoprol para visualização gráfica da estrutura e relações familiares. Resultados esperados: contribuir com a atenção integral a saúde das mulheres transexuais, além de oferecer embasamento para a prática de promoção da saúde no âmbito da Enfermagem. Descritores: Pessoas Transgênero; HIV; Assistência Integral à Saúde; Promoção da Saúde; Saúde Pública; Enfermagem.ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the organization of the family of transsexual young women with HIV/AIDS in the light of the Calgary model. Method: It is a qualitative, descriptive and exploratory survey. The study population is composed of transsexual young women, having by scenario an outpatient clinic for the treatment of HIV/AIDS patients in a reference hospital. The data collection will be through individual interviews, from a structured guide containing issues relevant to the objectives of the study. The interviews will be subjected to analysis in the R Interface software pour les Analyses do Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires (IRAMUTEQ) version 0.7 and Genoprol software for graphics structure visualization and family kinship. Expected results: To contribute to the integral attention to health of transsexual women and provide support for health promotion in the field of nursing. Descriptors: Transgender Persons; HIV; Comprehensive Health Care; Health Promotion; Public Health; Nursing.RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar la organización de la familia de las mujeres jóvenes transexuales con VIH/SIDA, a la luz del modelo de Calgary. Método: Estudio del tipo cualitativo, descriptivo y exploratorio. La población del estudio estará compuesta por jóvenes mujeres transexuales, teniendo por escenario una clínica ambulatoria para el tratamiento de pacientes con VIH/SIDA en un hospital de referencia. La recolección de datos será a través de entrevistas individuales, a partir de un plan de acción estructurado que contiene las cuestiones pertinentes a los objetivos del estudio. Las entrevistas estarán sujetas a análisis en la interfaz de software para R pour les Analyzes do Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires (IRAMUTEQ) versión 0.7 y software Genoprol para la estructura gráfica, la visualización y el parentesco. Resultados esperados: Contribuyen a la atención integral a la salud de las mujeres transexuales y brindan apoyo para la promoción de la salud en el campo de la enfermería. Descriptores: Personas Transgénero; VIH; Atención Integral de Salud; Promoción de la Salud; Salud Pública; Enfermería.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Enfermagem UFPE on lineSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207