MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795005213 · doi:10.1089/thy.2017.0543

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Unplanned Reoperations, Emergency Department Visits and Hospital Readmission After Thyroidectomy

2018· review· en· W2795005213 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThyroid · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFunnel plotMeta-analysisEmergency departmentConfidence intervalHospital readmissionPublication biasSystematic reviewEmergency medicineForest plotMEDLINEInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Unplanned reoperation, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital readmission following thyroid operations usually arise due to complications and are a source of frustration for both surgeons and patients. With the aim of providing insight important for the development of patient quality care improvement initiatives, the primary objective of this review was to evaluate the available literature systematically in order to determine the contemporary rates of reoperation, readmission, and ED visits following thyroid operations. A secondary study objective was to determine if there were any practices that showed promise in reducing the occurrence of these undesirable postoperative events. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocols. Twenty-two studies were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed to obtain the weighted-pooled summary estimates of rates of reoperations, ED visits, and unplanned hospital readmission. Jackknife sensitivity analyses were performed for each data set. Finally, in order to detect the risk of publication bias and the small-study effect, funnel plot analysis was performed. RESULTS: The pooled rate estimate for reoperation was very low (0.6% [confidence interval (CI) 0.3-1.1%]). This was subject to publication bias because smaller studies tended to report lower rates of reoperation. The pooled rate of ED visits was 8.1% [CI 6.5-9.8%], while the pooled rate of hospital readmission from 19 studies was 2.7% [CI 2.1-3.4%]. Neck hematoma was the most common reason for reoperation, while postoperative hypocalcemia was the most common reason for hospital readmission. CONCLUSIONS: ED visits and hospital readmission after thyroidectomy are common, and there are several practices that can reduce their occurrence. Routine postoperative calcium and vitamin D supplementation may reduce rates of postoperative hypocalcemia, and avoiding postoperative hypertension may decrease the risk of neck hematoma development and the need for reoperation. Older age, thyroid cancer, dependent functional status, higher ASA score, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, steroid use, hemodialysis, and recent weight loss increase the risk of hospital readmission after thyroid surgery. By further identifying risk factors for reoperation, ED visits, and readmission, this review may assist practitioners in optimizing perioperative care and therefore reducing patient morbidity and mortality after thyroid operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it