MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2795017649 · doi:10.1002/2017gl075714

Impact of Resolution on the Representation of Precipitation Variability Associated With the ITCZ

2017· article· en· W2795017649 on OpenAlexaff
Marc De Benedetti, G. W. K. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationGeorge Mason University
KeywordsIntertropical Convergence ZoneClimatologyPrecipitationDecorrelationUpwellingSea surface temperatureConvergence zoneGeologyConvectionEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyOceanographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) is responsible for most of the weather and climate in equatorial regions along with many tropical‐midlatitude interactions. It is therefore important to understand how models represent its structure and variability. Most ITCZ‐associated precipitation is convective, making it unclear how horizontal resolution impacts its representation. To assess this, we introduce a novel technique that involves calculation of the precipitation field's decorrelation length scale (DCLS) using model data sets that share a common lineage with horizontal resolutions from 16 to 160 km. All resolutions captured the ITCZ's mean structure; however, imprints of topography, such as Hawaii and sea surface temperature, including the variability associated with upwelling cold water off the coast of South America, are more clearly represented at higher resolutions. The DCLS analysis indicates that there are changes in the spatial variability of the ITCZ's precipitation that are not reflected in its mean structure, thus confirming its utility as a diagnostic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicClimate variability and models→French-language works237,207→