MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795045463 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby014.159

39.1 DNA METHYLATION OF IMMUNE CELLS IN PERSONS AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK FOR PSYCHOSIS

2018· article· en· W2795045463 on OpenAlexaff
Diana O. Perkins, Clark Jeffries, Jean Addington, Carrie Beardon, Kristin S. Cadenhead, Tyrone D. Cannon, Barbara A. Cornblatt, Daniel H. Mathalon, Thomas H. McGlashan, Larry J. Seidman, Ming T. Tsuang, Elaine F. Walker, Scott W. Woods

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosisSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)DNA methylationImmune systemPsychologyAnxietyPrepulse inhibitionMedicineInternal medicineImmunologyPsychiatryBiologyGeneticsGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dysregulated immune system is implicated in the development of psychotic disorders. Persons with schizophrenia have altered levels of circulating immune cell signaling molecules (cytokines), and elevation of specific cytokines predict conversion to psychosis in persons at clinical high risk. Whether these peripheral signals are a causal or a secondary phenomenon is unclear. But, subpopulations of circulating immune cells do regulate the brain from meningeal and perivascular locations influencing cognition, mood, and behavior, and thus may be relevant to schizophrenia vulnerability. Hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow differentiate into cascading subtypes depending on signals from other organs, especially the brain. For example, a monocyte subpopulation emerges with repeated social defeat that establish the persistence of anxiety-like behaviors; blocking their release or inhibiting their attachment to brain vascular endothelium prevents the emergence of anxiety-like behaviors. In humans, a similar monocyte subpopulation is associated with social isolation and other adversities including low SES, chronic stress, and bereavement. The North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS2) is an eight-site observational study of predictors and mechanisms of conversion to psychosis The full cohort includes 763 at clinical high risk (CHR) based on the Criteria of Prodromal State (COPS) and 279 demographically similar unaffected comparison (UC) subjects. Methylation of whole blood DNA collected in PAXgene tubes at baseline was analyzed with the Illumina 450k array in a subgroup of 59 subjects who converted to psychosis (CHR-C), 84 CHR subjects followed for 2 years who did not develop psychosis (CHR-NC) and 67 unaffected subjects (UC). Our analyses focused on methylation of promoter regions of genes, associated with gene expression. Classifier construction used Coarse Approximation Linear Function (CALF) with bootstrapping of 1000 random 80% subsets with replacement to determine statistical likelihood. We found highly overlapping sets of differentially methylated promoter regions in CHR-C subjects compared to CHR-NC and to UC subjects. A set of 10 markers correctly classified CHR-C and CHR-NC subjects with high accuracy (AUC=0.94, 95% CI 0.89–0.98). Included was SIRT1, a gene that is upregulated with HSV reactivation. Circulating immune cells excerpt powerful influences on mood, cognition and behavior. An obvious example is the experience of most human with “sickness syndrome”, characterized by apathy, avolition, and withdrawal, and triggered by immune-cell-released cytokines producing an adaptive, resource conserving, behavioral response. While at an early stage, our findings further implicate immune system dysregulation as a mechanism in the development of psychosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207